The Progressive Era

 As of today the United States continues to engage in military operations across various global regions, reflecting a persistent interventionist foreign policy. This approach has drawn criticism from a segment of conservative thinkers who advocate for more of a restrained and non-intervention list stance, yet their perspectives often remain  underrepresented on mainstream news. Antiwar voices are rarely heard on the news due to them challenging powerful interests. Corporate media rely on many of those who profit from war or global instability. 

In terms of media ownership and commercial interest. Large media corporations may have financial ties to defense contractors or other entities that benefit from military action. Journalists also depend on access to government and military officials discouraging dissent. This systematic narrowing of public discourse not only undermines the democratic deliberation  but also contributes to policy decisions that may not reflect the full spectrum of public opinion or serve  the national interest. Democracy functions best when citizens have access to a wide range of view points on matters of public  importance. When mainstream media platforms marginalize antiwar perspectives they effectively  constrain the information available  to citizens, hampering ability to form well-reasoned  opinions on critical matters of war and peace.When newsrooms present primarily pro-intervention voices they had indignantly positioned  military action as the default response to international conflicts. This framing subtly  shifts  the burden of proof from those advocating war to those advocating the diplomatic solutions  or non-intervention. There are compelling reasons  why antiwar perspectives deserve greater inclusion in the mainstream news coverage.The antiwar voices are  for sure mischaracterized as unpatriotic or isolationist, and further marginalizing them. Complex critiques don't fit the soundbite- driven by the nature of the cable news, which prefers clear cut news antiwar voices do exist in the news media landscape but particularly in private or independent medium opinion sections, academic publications, and increasingly on social medias and especially podcasts. On some international news platforms antiwar perspectives are featured more. The representation gap you're noting is a legitimate concern for those who believe that a robust debate about military intervention is essential for democratic discourse.